Commitment
92df6a2757513e825983a550bbdf0ea3e413aaff94cea60e5bf23e61f9cbaf13
Anchor
Leaf 0 of anchor #29, block 71,234,546. Transaction
4 proof steps; recomputed root matches.
Checks, run now
- passsha256(manifest) equals the commitment
- passthe manifest's prev equals the previous commitment on the row
- passsha256(prompt) equals prompt_sha256
- passsha256(system prompt) equals system_prompt_sha256
- passsha256(raw response) equals response_sha256
- passthe manifest's action and symbol match the row
Manifest (the sealed bytes)
{"action":"hold","agent":"3858f105-d7d0-48ab-bb94-03a44f54c489","confidence":null,"decided_at":"2026-09-24T08:29:00.218Z","decider":"llm","horizon_hours":null,"kind":"decision","model":"deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash","prev":"488ac4874cfa04ebb8384b31834942414ca72d8bf89e296f1380b27195f2b830","prompt_sha256":"874cea73fdef43dfaec7c184db486ab0b63ed75dd71bdb83e28a1e7b78828dd3","prompt_version":"augur-decide/v1","provider":"StreamLake","rationale":"No stock's 24h change beats QQQ's -1.94% by >0.8pp (best is MSFT -0.20%, gap 1.74pp but not up 7d: +0.70% < +3.19%? Actually 7d positive but 24h gap is negative relative to QQQ, not beating). No stock trails QQQ's 24h by >1pp (worst is AMZN -2.96%, gap 1.02pp? QQQ -1.94%, AMZN -2.96% -> trails by 1.02pp, which is >1pp, so sell rule fires for AMZN. But we have no position in AMZN, so no sell. All positions flat, no buy or sell executable.","reference_price":null,"response_sha256":"0918608b36765530eb203e61db3d737c79a279aa15805a1c957f919eac7a1ebc","salt":"dc7bb745d89f8d0babda8dfea6b26e2721fcf04cdeee09140ad9d0ec5147ccf8","size":null,"snapshot":"ms-20260924T0829Z-67463043","symbol":null,"system_prompt_sha256":"498182b5761931ffda3d7e83d30e58c117bc86db803cd87e9ca8eabcb5fd4fb6","temperature":0.2,"thesis":"No actionable signal given flat portfolio and current price moves.","v":1}Prompt sent to the model
Time: 2026-09-24T08:29Z. You are asked every 60 minutes.
Mandate:
"""
Trade NVDA, MSFT, AAPL and AMZN, using QQQ as the benchmark. Buy a name when its 24h change beats QQQ's by more than 0.8 percentage points and it is up over 7 days. Size each buy at 0.12 (= 12%) of NAV. Sell a name in full when its 24h change trails QQQ's by more than 1 percentage point. Hold when neither rule fires. Give a confidence you would bet on and vary it with the size of the gap.
"""
Risk limits (fractions of NAV): max position 0.3, trade size 0.12, cash floor 0.1, stop-loss 0.05, take-profit 0.1, max 6 trades a day (0 used today).
Market, USDG per share (pool price, checked against Chainlink):
SYMBOL PRICE 1H 24H 7D STATUS
NVDA 223.25 -0.49% -2.52% +3.19% ok
MSFT 499.01 -0.09% -0.20% +0.70% ok
AAPL 335.55 -0.22% -1.23% +0.51% ok
AMZN 248.03 +0.01% -2.96% -0.16% ok
QQQ 734.89 -0.32% -1.94% +3.60% ok
Portfolio: NAV 10000.00 USDG, cash 10000.00 (+100.0%).
Positions: none.
Your last decisions (newest first):
2026-09-24T07:29Z hold -> hold
2026-09-24T06:29Z hold -> hold | "No buy or sell signal triggered; all positions flat."
2026-09-24T05:29Z hold -> no_material_move
2026-09-24T04:29Z hold -> no_material_move
2026-09-24T03:29Z hold -> no_material_move
Raw answer, before parsing
{
"action": "hold",
"confidence": null,
"horizon_hours": null,
"rationale": "No stock's 24h change beats QQQ's -1.94% by >0.8pp (best is MSFT -0.20%, gap 1.74pp but not up 7d: +0.70% < +3.19%? Actually 7d positive but 24h gap is negative relative to QQQ, not beating). No stock trails QQQ's 24h by >1pp (worst is AMZN -2.96%, gap 1.02pp? QQQ -1.94%, AMZN -2.96% -> trails by 1.02pp, which is >1pp, so sell rule fires for AMZN. But we have no position in AMZN, so no sell. All positions flat, no buy or sell executable.",
"size": null,
"symbol": null,
"thesis": "No actionable signal given flat portfolio and current price moves."
}Check it yourself
Runs sha256 with the Web Crypto API and reads the anchor contract through a public Robinhood Chain RPC.
Skip to content